These standards have been designed to improve the safety and quality of patient care in NHS Wales and ensure that our patients have the best possible experience as they navigate their pathways. It is a consensus document that has been co-produced with Primary and Secondary Care Clinicians and endorsed by the All Wales Medical Directors.They apply to all NHS Wales clinicians communicating clinical information between General Practice and Health board run services. They also apply to clinicians working in the private sector who interface with General Practice.They replace WHC (2018) WHC/2018/014 - All Wales Communication Standards between Primary and Secondary care (AWCS)Individual professional standards:1 Investigations: Any clinician managing a patient’s care who deems an investigation is necessary should: Request the investigation Take responsibility for actioning of the result Communicate the result directly to the patient and help them understand it. Delegating these responsibilities is appropriate if there is agreement to do so (see Standard 5).2 Referrals: Any clinician referring a patient for a consultation should: Ensure the patient understands the reason for the referral  Ensure the patient knows who is responsible for their care Ensure the patient knows what should happen next Ensure the referral contains all information needed to determine the priority of the referral Make the referral themselves when they have the competence to do so When not making a referral themselves, a clinician should never direct a patient to another clinician to ask for a specific referral or expected timeframe for action. Clinicians should respect colleagues' autonomy and allow them to determine what is best for the patient. 3 Med3: The clinician who advises the patient to refrain from work must: Issue the Med3 Ensure the duration of the note covers the time period to expected return to work or the next planned review 4 Prescribing: A clinician recommending that a patient starts a new medication must: Issue a prescription if that medication needs to be initiated within the next seven daysIssue a prescription for a minimum of two weeks but longer if clinically appropriate Communicate all necessary counselling of the patient if recommending another clinician starts the medication Ensure prescribing and prescribing recommendations should be within the scope of practice of the clinician to whom the recommendation is being made Name the responsible clinician when recommendations are from non-prescribers. Adhere to shared care prescribing processes by retaining prescribing responsibility until the GP has accepted the request and received the stable handover letter Take account of guidance provided in the health board’s prescribing formulary and the availability of the medicine in primary care, when initiating or recommending a GP initiates medication(s)  Be prepared to retain prescribing responsibility if the medication does not have a UK marketing authorisation (i.e. the medication is unlicensed)Be prepared to retain prescribing responsibility if the medication has a UK marketing authorisation but it is being prescribed in a way which is outside the terms of its authorisation (i.e. the medication is licensed but prescribed ‘off-label’), where such prescribing is not generally accepted clinical practiceOrganisational Standards5 Investigations: Organisations should have standard operating procedures (SOPs) to mitigate against clinical governance risks and transfer of clinical responsibility when requesting investigations and actioning the results There should also be SOPs with regards communication of results to patients These SOPs should support clinicians in adhering to the individual professional standards  6 Referral and Outpatient Communications:Must be compliant with data protection regulations. Must be made via the nationally or locally agreed electronic method where it exists.  Must be actioned promptly, including requests for further information Changes to priority must be communicated to the referrer and the patient Should be addressed to the referrer with copies to the patient and their GP if not the original referrer.  Referrals that are declined, must be clinically justified and require timely communication to the referrer within the timeframe stated in Planned Care guidance (currently 48 hours).7 Expedite Requests:Patients who make contact to expedite appointments should be dealt with accordingly: Should be based on clinical need; a long waiting time does not alter priority For patient experience, clinically valid expedite requests should be dealt with by the team who they contact, rather than directed elsewhereFollow-up appointments for review or treatment should be brought to the attention of the specialist overseeing their care for action.  8 Did Not Attend:Care needs to be taken to ensure reasonable adjustments are made for patients with protected characteristics under the Equality Act. Where patients do not attend for out-patient appointments without giving notice, in line with WG guidelines for pathway management, they will be discharged. The original referrer, the GP (if not the original referrer) and patient should all be advised of the discharge. Where the patient has reasonable grounds to challenge the decision, they should be reappointed without a new referral. In the case of vulnerable adults and children who do not attend refer to the local “was not brought” policy 9 Patient Discharges:  Electronic discharge advice letters (eDAL) should be completed at the time of discharge, and a copy sent with the patient Patients should be discharged with at least two weeks of medication (which may be supplied from the hospital or from medication already in the patient’s possession. Where there may be a longer than usual time needed to source a medication in primary care (e.g. where a special formulation or unlicensed preparation is prescribed), consideration should be given to providing at least four weeks of medication at discharge  Discharges out of hours should ensure appropriate handover to Out of Hours providers e.g. End of Life Care. Similar information should be provided for completion of an ambulatory care assessment. 10 Pre-operative Assessment Clinics Must have named medical support  Should first use the named medical support when unexpected findings are identified. Refer internally for optimisation for surgery, or an appropriately commissioned optimisation service  If you are aware of a breach of these standards, please datix the incident and contact us so that we can ensure these standards are upheld throughout Swansea Bay. Our Deputy chair has created some resources, including a video, for training staff on these Standards and are ideal for induction training or department training within a primary or secondary care setting. Slides are available here:Video of presentation available here:# AWCS

The clinical and professional responsibility you have for your patients does not mean that you must provide services over and above those for which you are contracted, or that you cannot give reasonable notice to cease doing such additional services. The BMA has useful advice regarding how to answer responses you encounter when declining non-GMS or unfunded work and it is worth reviewing the All Wales General Practice and Health Board Clinical Interface Standards for evidence of the standards which apply to all NHS Wales clinicians communicating clinical information between General Practice and Health board run services. 'It's not professional' What I do outside my contract is a personal choice and plenty of other professionals decline extra work if the remuneration is not appropriate. 'This is a GMC matter' It is not a matter for the GMC and indeed, threatening referral and using this as a threat for me to work extra in my own time is harassment. I continue to deliver everything expected of me as required under my contract [latest information on the 2025-26 contract available here and GPDF have funded a useful consolidated document “NHS General Medical Services Contracts Regulations Wales Consolidated 2025”] and Good Medical Practice [download here]. Whether or not I undertake additional extra-contractual work is my choice. 'You have a responsibility to the patients' And I take that responsibility very seriously and will continue to fulfil all aspects of my contract and continue to deliver excellent care. However, I cannot be forced or made to feel guilty about not undertaking extra work in my own time for inadequate rates of pay. 'Your colleagues are doing this work' Being extra contractual it's a matter for personal choice. 'You are taking money from other staff' The funding of the health service is a matter of political choice for the government. I am only asking to be paid fairly for work I undertake that is outside of my contract. 'You are taking money from patients' The government have a responsibility to provide a health service, it is not the responsibility of individuals. Part of that responsibility is to pay staff enough to motivate them. It's a political choice. 'There is a financial crisis' It's not fair that the public sector is expected to pay for every financial crisis when others in the economy do not. We cannot expect NHS staff to subsidise the service with their own pay. 'It is not in our budget' It is not my responsibility to ensure that sufficient budget is allocated to adequately pay doctors to provide the service.

The latest version of The National Health Service (General Medical Services Contracts) (Wales) Regulations 2023 - aka GMS regulations - is available here. GPDF have provided Consolidated Regulations for 2025 which include: NHS Performers List Regulations Wales Consolidated 2025 NHS General Medical Services Contracts Regulations Wales Consolidated 2025 NHS Statement of Financial Entitlements Regulations Wales Consolidated 2025

Read about the outcome of tripartite negotiations for the Welsh GMS contract, which covers 2025/26 and investment for 2026/27 on the BMA website. This includes a joint letter form GPC Wales and Welsh Government and a summary of the changes which have been considered and agreed through the course of formal negotiations to date, setting out a full picture of the final overall contract package offer.

GP practices in Wales are legally required to respond to Freedom of Information (FOI) Act requests. The MDU have a useful guide here to help with queries and there is FOI advice for GP practices availbale from the ICO. Under Schedule 1 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, GPs providing primary medical services under an NHS contract are considered "public authorities." However, this only applies to information related to the NHS services they provide. Key Obligations for GP Practices in Wales: Every GP practice in Wales must comply with two main duties under the Act, a useful dcument for reference is the ICO's Guide to Information provided by GPs under the model publication scheme: The Duty to Respond: If someone makes a written request for information, the practice must confirm whether they hold that information and, if they do, provide it (unless an exemption applies). The Publication Scheme: Practices must proactively publish certain information about their operations. Most practices adopt the ICO Model Publication Scheme, which includes: Who they are (staffing structures, contact details). What they spend (funding received from the NHS). Their priorities (plans for the practice). Policies and procedures (complaints, data protection, health and safety). What Is Not Covered by FOI? It is a common misconception that FOI can be used to access patient records. This is incorrect. Patient Records: These are strictly exempt from FOI. If a patient wants their own records, this is handled as a Subject Access Request (SAR) under the Data Protection Act 2018 / UK GDPR. Private Work: Information relating to the GP’s private (non-NHS) income or business is generally not subject to FOI. Vexatious Requests: A practice can refuse a request if it is clearly designed to cause disruption or is a repeat of a previous request from the same person. The Cost Limit: Practices can refuse a request if it would take more than 18 hours of staff time (or cost more than £450) to find and extract the information. The 20-Day Rule Once a practice receives a valid written FOI request, the clock starts. They have 20 working days to provide the response. If you receive a request that is unclear, the 20-day "clock" stops while you ask the requester for clarification. It only restarts once you have a clear description of what they want. What constitutes a valid request? For a request to be legally binding on a practice, it must: Be in writing (email is acceptable). State the real name of the requester (pseudonyms are not valid). Provide an address for correspondence. Describe the information requested clearly. # foi

Enhanced services vary across Wales, and there is no single resource describing them. Morgannwg LMC has created a summary spreadsheet (in both excel and pdf format) describing the services available in every Healthboard in Wales. The information was obtained by making freedom of information requests to each Healthboard and also to Welsh government. All information in the spreadsheet comes directly from these public sources.Please use it to support your business planning and negotiations.This project was made possible through a generous grant from GPDF. If you have any questions or suggestions please contact Morgannwg LMC.The information is available as an Excel spreadsheet / PDF along with the source information here.Enhanced Service Financial Calculator - Thanks to North Wales LMCNorth Wales LMC have developed a calculator to aid business decisions about the viability of enhanced services for practices. It will allow additional costs such as pension, NI contributions etc to be automatically included. Just input hourly staff rates and time spent by differing members of the practice team to get an overall estimate of practice costs to complete an activity.The calculator is an indicative aid only. Practices must check the information, assumptions, specifications and payment arrangements for themselves and use it at their own discretion and risk. It is not intended to replace practice-specific professional advice or determine whether a service should be undertaken.Please feel free to share it with relevant colleagues or practices if you consider it useful.How to guide:Calculator:Recent Uplift from SBUHBPlease note that MLMC were unable to reach a mutually agreeable position regarding an uplift with SBUHB. SBUHB felt that their offer of a 5% uplift was reasonable considering their financial position, but MLMC did not feel that they could endorse the offer based upon the information contained in the comparative spreadsheet.If practices would like a further discussion about supplementary services please do not hesitate to get in touch with MLMC. The letter from SBUHB can be downloaded below for reference:

Work out the cost of the serviceLook at current level of remuneration and cost to deliver service.You may find this calculator usefulHave a chat amongst clinical team and with practice manager to decide next steps.If you wish to continue then read no further Payment not covering costs and / or impacting on GMS care?You can withdraw from the service How to withdraw:Give 3/12 notice in writing to the Health Board of your intention and reasons.Ask for them to inform you of where to redirect patients once notice period has ended. Put a time date on response to this and put a diary marker in your diary to check this has been responded too.Copy in the other services affected by the decisionTop tip – make sure you get confirmation of receipt – email route perfect for thisContinue to provide the service for 3/12Start updating your staff that service is no longer going to be provided and ensure all know where to refer patients once service has ended. Consider giving them a “script” to use when faced with such requestsStart to inform your patients via posters / screen messages / during consultations of when this service will no longer be available and why (if appropriate)The LMC will be developing patient information materials for you to use in some casesConsider how you can best utilise the freed up resource/ time to provide additional capacity within your clinical teamKeep trackMake a note on your systems when service is due to endRemind all staff after that date that you no longer provide these services and where they should send patients.What if the HB don’t tell you what to do with patients after notice period?Contact the LMC OfficeMorgannwg LMC is here to support you! It is not unusual to feel concerned at stopping work OR to think that you are the only practice considering taking this action. YOU ARE NOT. Practices can no longer continue providing services at financial or clinical capacity costs to themselves. Follow the checklist above, discuss as a practice and reach your own conclusion.

Contractual Requirements and Data Entry A new flu vaccination delivery model has resulted in some operational challenges. All provider practices must adhere to the National Primary Care Contractual Instruments (PCCIs) Schedule 2025, which is the same for both general practices and community pharmacy to ensure equity of service. The specification requires that vaccine administration and stock checks must be data entered onto the WIS system by the end of the working day. Due to significant and sporadic outages of the WIS system, practices were previously authorized to input data on the following working day, a situation which may have caused confusion. Practices must log any data upload concerns with the primary care team and immunisations team via the general primary care email (even on weekends) to maintain an audit trail. A DHCW service point call is also recommended for evidence. The Health Board (HB) agreed to send out a communication to clarify contractual data entry requirements and address any confusion. Functionality and Use of WIS Practices reported that WIS flu invites were being sent too late, causing patients to miss appointments. WIS is sending generic blanket text messages that invite patients to a session rather than a specific time. It was agreed that the specification allows practices to use their in-house appointment systems or "established booking system including GP Clinical systems" to invite patients for flu vaccination; the specification does not mandate using WIS for flu invites. Opportunistic administration of the flu vaccine is encouraged. There is confusion because the requirement is to ONLY use WIS to invite patients for the COVID-19 vaccine, which is difficult to manage alongside the separate rules for flu, especially given changes to the eligible age ranges. The HB confirmed the technical ability to use WIS for both flu and COVID-19 invites, but noted "teething problems." The HB agreed to issue a clarification immediately to address misinformation regarding invitation methods. WIS Write-Back Delays Significant WIS write-back delays were reported (up to four days), which creates a clinical governance risk as patients could receive the vaccine from another provider (e.g., a pharmacy) during the delay period. A national update was shared indicating the WIS platform had been down from 6-9 October to address duplicate entries. Duplications were found from both clinical systems (EMIS/Vision) and WIS, as well as some unexplained duplicates. The impact of these delays on the practice's ability to call and recall patients will need to be monitored. HB Vaccination Assurance The HB has not started any general 'mop-up' programme and plans to begin administering to the general population only on December 1st, 2025, as per the national specification. Requests to vaccinate housebound patients have been declined, with a request made for those practices signed up to the supplementary service to administer. The HB has agreed to a request to vaccinate care home residents for flu. This area needs greater clarity and coordination for future years, as the HB administers COVID-19 in care homes while practices are asked to do the flu vaccine. A national Task and Finish Group has been set up to specifically resolve care home vaccination challenges. Other groups who may have been vaccinated by the HB include pregnant women at HB clinics and NHS staff, which may have caused confusion. Due to responding to specific practice-based requests, the HB is currently unable to issue an assurance that no flu vaccines have been administered. Uptake Targets Practices still have a 75% target rate for vaccination. The HB is confident there is enough stock for all eligible over 65s. Uptake for 2-3 year olds and at-risk groups remains low, consistent with previous years. A representative noted that recent negative discussions in the media have affected this year's uptake, and asked the HB to update the website with more guidance to help patients research vaccine safety. The HB agreed to look into ways to disseminate patient information. Patient Booking Phone Line Patient delays were reported when using the immunisation service booking line. The HB confirmed a phone outage on one specific day in October. Outside of this, the average call waiting time was 3 minutes, with the longest reported wait being 10 minutes.

What is the problem? HMRC has recently taken a keen interest in the employment status of many independent contractors which includes GPs working in a sessional capacity. In essence, if it determines that you are employed, as opposed to being self-employed, then your tax and national insurance contributions will be removed by the organisation which pays you. In addition, if the organisation has, in HMRC’s opinion, wrongly treated you as self-employed then the organisation can face a significant fine and interest which can potentially go back as far as 20 years. Therefore, this is causing much angst amongst employers. In particular, Health Boards have become very concerned about their potential liabilities and have commissioned specific advice from Deloitte. The Health Board interpretation of this advice has concluded that GPs working for the Health Board but not in a salaried position (e.g. in out of hours centres; in prisons; doing shifts in a minor injuries unit; working in directly managed practices) should be classed as employed for taxation purposes but not for employment purposes. Thus, you would be unable to access employment rights, which includes annual leave / sick leave / maternity leave / and other parental rights. Their assertion applies to all sessional GPs whether working through an intermediary (where IR35 applies) or not. Please note, for avoidance of doubt, this guidance applies also to GP principals or salaried GPs offering services and directly contracting with the Health Board on a sessional basis for the types of work as outlined above. Does GPC Wales believe that the Health Board interpretation of the taxation status is correct for GPs working in above settings? Sadly, it appears that the HMRC toolkit to determine whether an individual is employed or self-employed isn’t always that clear-cut, and thus there are risks to any organisation in getting it wrong. However, we support the guidance in other parts of the UK; namely that blanket application of the ruling is wrong as it doesn’t allow for differences in an individual’s circumstances. Does GPC Wales believe that the Health Board interpretation is correct for the employment status / ability to access employment rights of GPs working in above settings? We do not feel this interpretation is correct. The tests to determine whether an individual is employed for taxation purposes and for access to employment rights are very similar, and it seems nonsensical to say they apply to one section and not to the other. We believe this could be open to challenge by GPs who contract directly with the Health Board. However, if you are working through an intermediary/ personal service company (see below) then it is unlikely that you could argue you are employed for employment benefits. Isn’t this just about the HMRC IR35 regulation? This is wider than the application of IR35 regulations. IR35 solely applies to GPs working through an intermediary such as limited liability companies. These are often described as a personal service company which individuals have set up so that they avoid paying tax and are liable to a lower rate of tax via corporation tax (which currently stands at 19% rather than the tax levels for higher earners) and this is why HMRC at trying to close the loophole. The approach from the Welsh Health Boards applies to all sessional GPs working as above. Matt Mayer from the BMA sessional GPs committee has written an excellent blog on this issue which can be accessed here. Should I just accept the HB advice? We would say no. There are a few issues to consider Lack of consultation: is this fair or right given the significant change to your terms and conditions of service? The assertion that employment status does not confer employment rights Do your own HMRC toolkit assessment and take individual accountant advice Talk to your LMC or contact the BMA if you are a member (unfortunately neither are in a position to offer individual legal or financial advice). WHAT ACTIONS ARE POSSIBLE? 1. What can I do? Consider the BMA website advice, complete the HMRC toolkit and discuss the results with your accountant. You could use it to challenge the Health Board to apply non-employed status to you. However, it is unlikely the Health Board will change its stance and the toolkit isn’t quite clear cut. Consider whether you want to continue working for an organisation that has taken this unilateral action. Your accountant may be able to help guide this with respect to impact on tax brackets etc. Consider whether to ask your LMC to act on your behalf and outline what course of action you wish them to take. You should do this whether you continue working or not. Consider whether you are willing to withdraw services or not? The BMAs sessional GP subcommittee states that you can consider the following: If you are willing to withdraw services, then further think about whether you would add your name to signatures to be gathered by LMCs threatening to withdraw services OR write to the Health Board declaring a termination of service in accordance with the contractual obligations to which you are subject. If you are not willing to withdraw services, then (if you are a GP who contracts directly rather than via an intermediary) consider writing to the Health Board telling them that you believe you are entitled to statutory employment protection and reserve the right to take them to an employment tribunal, and advise them, if employment tribunal found in your favour that you would be chasing historic holiday pay / sick pay / pension etc. back to your start date. This latter needs to be done by an individual GP. 2. What can your LMC do? LMCs do have the responsibility of acting on behalf of all GPs in their area in all their working roles. To do so effectively they need a clear mandate from the workforce affected – therefore you have to play your role in making your feelings known. The LMC can: liaise with Health Board to ask further questions as to validity of this change to terms and conditions of service through seeking to see evidence, challenging lack of consultation, highlighting potential adverse impact on sustainability of workforce and service provision (including whether this is on the Health Board’s risk register) work with the Health Board to find possible solutions e.g. deferred implementation date of changes to enable consultation, devising a zero-hours contract for local GPs to work under which could confer some employment rights etc. keep local GPs up to date with likely impact of these decisions and progress on solutions work on your behalf without you having to raise your head above the parapet e.g. gather signatures from affected GPs threatening to withdraw services; OR collate responses from GPs to the Health Boards declaring a termination of services in accordance with the contractual obligations to which they are subject. 3. What is GPC Wales doing? GPC Wales is: working closely with LMCs to support them in progressing local discussions and solutions on behalf of GPs in their area (that’s why it is important to make your views and situation known to LMCs) in our regular meetings with the Welsh Government, highlighting risks to service provision and workforce sustainability in an already creaking service area, requesting that it seeks assurance from Health Boards on how these risks have been considered, including in respect of winter pressure plans considering what other national solutions may need to be implemented after listening to the profession and seeing how the Health Boards respond e.g. a national zero-hours contract for GPs working in settings as above What already happened in Wales and elsewhere? Betsi Cadwaladr UHB did not use Deloitte to determine its stance but instead worked directly with HMRC. This has already been put in place and GPs have made individual decisions whether or not to accept changes, and this has resulted in less GPs working in directly managed practices. In Dorset, a blanket policy was applied early in 2017 which was challenged by GPs, LMC and GPC. A new deal was offered to GPs with better pay and employment rights and a catastrophe was averted. In Swindon, the OOH trust applied a blanket policy but despite pressure did not back down and this resulted in great difficulty in sourcing doctors. What should I do next? It comes down to whether you as an individual want to take action on this. Please review this guidance carefully and consider all the available options before deciding on your response. The Local Medical Committees and GPC Wales are here to help. We need to know your views to inform our next steps in discussions with Health Boards at a local level, and the Welsh Government on a national basis. Please inform your LMC about what you want to see happen.

The Scheme for General Medical Practice Indemnity (GMPI) is a discretionary state-backed scheme that covers clinical negligence claims for incidents occurring on or after 1 April 2019. The indemnity coverage differs significantly depending on how the GP is engaged: 1. Out of hours services (OOH) provided via contractual arrangements between a Health Board and an independent provider/sub-contractor, are captured by the scheme for GMPI. This includes any locum or agency staff who are engaged via such independent provider/sub-contractor. However, all locum doctors who are engaged by an independent provider sub-contractor (other than those doing locum work solely in their own GP practice) are required to join the All Wales Locum Register, to have access to the scheme for GMPI 2. Any employees, locum, agency or bank workers who are directly engaged by a Health Board are captured by standard NHS indemnity arrangements. (this is not GMPI)  So you need to be quite clear as to your employment status and if it qualifies for section one then you are covered under the GMPI and need to be on the whole Wales register but don't have to document every Out Of Hours shift. So for peace of mind individuals should get clarity about their contractual status with the health board and then contact their indemnity provider to see if they are covered. The other burning question is all the guidance talks about Out Of Hours services and again clarification would need to be gained from GMPI regarding NHS111 which operates in hours. Update 27/1/26 Further to enquiry from SBHB they can confirm that when an OOH service is provided directly by a HB—whether the HB employs staff or engages locums/agency workers—those individuals are fully covered under the longstanding NHS indemnity not GMPI, just as hospital doctors are with no requirement for this work to be recorded in Locum Hub Wales. There is of course the additional requirement for MDU/MPD etc indemnity for professional issues. The same applies to NHS 111 workers. Do I Need to Register for the All Wales Locum Register? # ooh # gmpi

Currently using cryocautery, curettage and cautery for the treatment of warts does fall under the GMS contract: Minor surgery6.  A contractor must—(a) make available to patients, cryocautery, curettage and cautery of warts, verrucae and other skin lesions where clinically appropriate, and(b)ensure that its record of any treatment provided under this paragraph includes—details of the minor surgery provided to the patient, and        (ii) the consent of the patient to that treatment.Therefore this means that practices cannot deny patients the treatment for conditions specified in the contract but the management plan for the treatment remains a clinical decision and should be made case by case. The practice determines if clinically appropriate and if they feel cryocautery, curettage or cautery is the correct treatment then the practice has to provide it under the GMS contract.If you have any queries regarding this please do get in touch.

On 16/9/26 SBUHB Primary Care Team have released the following statement regarding funding arrangements for patients who require escalation to the community wound care clinics and are affected by the waiting times to access these clinics which can be used as evidence for PPV claims:"Dear ColleagueThe LMC has raised ongoing concerns regarding waiting times for review and handover to Community Wound Care Clinics, and the potential implications for continuation of payment and possible PPV reclaims. We can confirm that the service specification states:"Be aware that if a wound has not healed by six weeks, clinicians should refer the patient to a specialist service (e.g. the Community Wound Care Service)."Where a referral has been made to the Community Wound Care Service for assessment and review, practices will not be penalised for providing ongoing wound care pending that review. In such circumstances, continuation of care by the practice will not result in PPV recovery or payment clawback where the delay is attributable to waiting times within the Community Wound Care Service.In addition, where a wound is showing little or no evidence of healing before the six-week point, practices may wish to consider making an earlier referral to the Community Wound Care Service, taking account of current waiting times and their clinical judgement, to help avoid unnecessary delays in specialist review and ongoing management.We hope this provides clarification and reassurance. If you have any queries, please contact the Primary Care Team.Craige WilsonDeputy Chief Operating Officer and PCTSG Service Group Director"Whilst we are pleased that SBUHB have released this letter, Morgannwg LMC feels it is important to reiterate that if your practice has not signed up to the complex wound care supplementary service and continue to manage complex wounds, GMPI have indicated that you might not be indemnified for this work. GMPI scheme coverage applies only where activity is stipulated within the GMS contract or constitutes a qualifying primary medical service arrangement commissioned directly by the HB. Operating without indemnity would be against GMC and NMC guidance and also not in line with HB clinical governance procedures. In light of this position, we suggest that practices:Contact GMPI (and your medical defence provider) directly to clarify your practice's specific position and discuss these points at a practice meeting to establish a formal management plan.If necessary contact the HB to outline your practice's position, asking where the HB proposes complex wound patients, which remain a HB responsibility, should be directed for safe management. We appreciate that this situation creates significant operational challenges for practices, but acknowledging and mitigating the risk of working without indemnity cover when managing complex wounds is essential.

Whilst we have not had formal confirmation from SBUHB, it appears that sexual health services are directing patients requesting contraceptive services to their GP. Oral contraceptives and depot contraceptives are part of GMS provision so practices have to provide these services. Practices can also sign up to the relevant Enhanced Service (ES) to provide copper/hormonal IUDs. If they do not sign up for this ES then patients requiring IUDs will need to be referred to gynaecology and the LMC is disappointed that there is no provision for these patients outside of the normal outpatient gynaecological waiting times. Experts in the field have advised that practices are aware of newer developments in depo provision such as Depo SubQ Provera/ Sayana Press which are self administered by the patients and are one option which can reduce the burden on overstretched practices providing these services. We also note that all national and HB patient facing literature still indicates that a full suite of contraceptive services remain available at the clinics and have advised SBUHB to adapt these resources to prevent confusion and unecessary inconvenience for patients:NHS 111 Wales - Health A-Z : Sexual health clinicsSexual Health Services - Swansea Bay University Health BoardContraception - Public Health Wales

There has been ongoing confusion about the Allergy Referral Process resulting in patients being bounced between their GP and Heartlands due to a lack of clarity.You will recall that in February 2024 the LMC confirmed that the access to Cardiff allergy services and immunology specialist service had been decommissioned. All new SBUHB referrals were to be sent to West Sandwell & Birmingham NHS Trust via the Prior Approval route as an interim arrangement, whilst alternative commissioning options were explored.The HB have not commissioned a local service and no timeline has been provided. GPs are expected to continue to refer via the IFPR process and the agreed process with Heartlands is as follows:Prior Approval request completed and submitted to SBUHB at: planning.office@wales.nhs.ukDecision made by SBUHB and decision letter sent to the requesting GP via emailRequesting GP then EMAIL the allergy referral PLUS a copy of the above-mentioned decision letter to: I&AMedicalSecretaries@uhb.nhs.ukHeartlands will receive and list the referral - If they do not receive a copy of the decision letter for approval, then they will not be able to list the patient. We have updated the Prior Approval Application Form (attached) to include the telephone number, the email address and prepopulated answers to try and minimise the administrative process. #Individual Patient Funding Requests #IPFR